it is normal"Talent encourages move" or "policy in disguise to rescue"

Appeared in the current property market regulation is in effect a sensitive time, arranged a special capital subsidies talent buyers, there is clearly a "de facto bailout" suspicion and lack of policy and legal point of view of rationality. As a suburb center of Hangzhou, Hangzhou economic development zone, recently arranged a special capital of 100 million Yuan, for in-zone enterprises employee rental assistance and housing subsidies. In accordance with the provisions, housingApplicants must be within the year 2011 in the purchase of commercial housing development zone-wide, belongs to first-time buyer of senior management in a one-time subsidy of $ 100,000. 　　For rental swtor power leveling, development zone enterprises 5 Yuan/square meter per month rent subsidy. Positive effects of market regulation in policy to emerge sensitive period, economic development zone, Hangzhou implementation this paper instrument, it is normal"Talent encourages move" or "policy in disguise to rescue"? Market regulation policy there is no adjustment signs, large and medium-sized property companies prepared to "winter", prices continued to fall in market is expected to have been formed. 　　In this situation, the $ 100 million to shoulder the heavy task of reversing the downturn in the property market as a whole atmosphere. However, you cannot change market expectations, does not mean that noTo change policy expected. Hangzhou economic development zone, the introduction of this measure, no matter what name, but objectively speaking has shown distinct from the property market regulation policy trend. One of the most closely watched a clause--"housing applicants must in 2011, in the context of development zone of commercial housing purchased" even more suspicion: Why worry? Even though this tendency was for peopleEncourages the mind, but we had a coordination of macroeconomic policies and policies in the region do not, out of step. 　　This is not in tune, for control policy is in itself a hedge, a discount. More important is to come up with financial subsidies for specific groups of houses also suffered torture about the fair. This $ 100 million fund from where? Whether going through relevant procedures of the TribunalNuclear and approved? Subsidized with public money is not of specific vulnerable groups, the apparent lack of rationality. 　　If the authorization and disbursement of funds used nor transparent, then it lacks legitimacy. May be unfair, but also in other areas. If development zone can implement policies similar to the rescue, so why not apply the same policy in other districts? Regulatory policies shouldRegional features are being implemented seriously, differ? Managers in the Government, it must be recognized by the "no provision impracticable". 　　If these policy grey area is not clearly defined, then we cannot say star wars the old republic power leveling, Fund subsidized housing is illegal. Since recently, some cities aimed at specific groups, in the implementation within a specific areaPolicies such as subsidies and settled in the award of the purchase, are common. Shenzhen established in 2009 to subsidy policies, fellows will receive $ 2 million to a maximum, a one-time payment of $ 600,000 per month for a further 23,000, are higher than most people's wages. Such policies, underscored the highly recognized the talent of social values, of course, but also caused by a number of policy concerns and rational questions. Even if theThese policies do not have the disguised intent to rescue, but still need constraints of institutional frameworks. 　　Otherwise, it could become law in macro-control policies outside the zone. In fact, for a talented, really encouraging and favorable environment, is not authorized by the lack of transparency in monetary subsidies, and, on the contrary, is that they can feel perfect and transparent system. This is the talent market propagationThe real premise. Property market regulation, too. ()